In-House vs. Outsource: Why Outsourcing Recruitment is the Best Way to Save
An in-house recruitment team costs 26% to 140% more per worked hour than working with Hire Abroad. The main reason is simple: you pay an in-house team every month, and you pay Hire Abroad only for the hours that workers work. This article shows how we get to these numbers. We compare two options for a staffing agency: build your own recruitment team, or work with a partner like Hire Abroad. We use one example for both: keeping 100 blue-collar workers at work for one full year. In-House Vs. Outsource Recruitment: Why This Question Matters Filling 100 spots sounds simple: It’s classic high-volume recruitment. But in blue-collar, where workers usually arrive from abroad, high turnover is normal. Workers quit, find other options, get promoted, return home, or stop early. This means you do not hire 100 people once. You hire many more, again and again, through the year. Blue-collar staffing has a high rotation rate. This means that often, you will end up hiring 150-200 people throughout the year to keep those 100 spots filled. This is something you often can’t fully control, and a hidden cost many companies don’t plan for. Have Your Own Recruitment Team Having your own